Don鈥檛 Be Fooled by Misleading Labels!
ADVERTISEMENT
The web links to the Government web sites are "out of Date". But they do suggest to click on other links as shown. Noted the comment are 8 years old. Interesting article, thanks. Tom
Pretty straight forward information and is consistent with my recent 'nutritionist' visit. Here's an interesting catch 22 that may be presenting itself to at least a significant percentage of the population NOT confronted with obesity, but who have a need to revisit cholesterol levels via diet control (like me). Like you, who appears to have a very active physical life on or in a farm environment, I spend as much as 20-30 hours a week on top of a desk jockey job involved in all the physical activities associated with managing livestock. Average daily calorie intake just to maintain body weight runs between 3,000 and 5,000 calories DAILY. Would be interested in seeing something on how to balance the whole 'no saturated, no polyunsaturated' fat and accelerated fiber diet with that kind of calorie intake needs. I recognize obesity is a universal concern, but the challenges confronted by those with 'other' issues appears to be discounted as not quite so important. Trust me, losing weight when you are at optimum but need to alter diet is as equally problematic. Might make for an interesting flip side post.
You had me until you recommended the Center for Science in the Public Interest. This organization of attorneys and activists are devout Vegans pressuring the world population to adopt their personal habits. There is NO real science or solid research involved, only Michael Jacobson's personal opinion.
Hi Loey,
Please note that I didn't recommend the CSPI itself, only their food-labeling publication linked in my blog post.
I myself advocate only for healthful eating, not a specific dietary regimen. I do believe that food consumers ought to have simple, clear, and unambiguous labeling that describes what's in each package of food offered for sale. Furthermore, I believe food-marketing literature and labeling should be free of deceptive or misleading claims.
I thought the CSPI publication was thorough, fact-based, and balanced in its (albeit strong) recommendations for improved food labeling. I didn't find any activism on behalf of a particular diet, personal point of view, or way of life.
Have you read it? If not, I suggest you spend some time with it. If you have, please point out the sections you find objectionable. Perhaps we can have more discussion on the topic, here or in some venue outside the blog.